8-12-2000
PIERRE AUGUSTE RENOIR
(1841 - 1919)
After
the lapse of a century it is hard for us to understand why these
pictures aroused such a storm of derision and indignation. We realize without
difficulty that the apparent sketchiness has nothing whatever to do with
carelessness but is the outcome of great artistic wisdom. If Renoir had painted
in every detail, the picture would look dull and lifeless. We remember that a
similar conflict had faced artists once before, in the fifteenth century, when
they had first discovered how to mirror nature. We remember that the very
triumphs of naturalism and of perspective had led to their figures looking
somewhat rigid and wooden, and that it was only the genius of Leonardo that
overcame this difficulty by letting the forms intentionally merge into dark
shows - the device that was called "sfumato". It was their
discovery that dark shadows of the kind Leonardo used for modelling do not occur
in sunlight and open air, which barred this traditional way out to the
Impressionists. Hence, they had to go farther in the intentional blurring of
outlines than any previous generation had gone.
They knew that the human eye is a marvelous instrument. You need only
give in the right hint and it builds up for you the whole form which it knows to
be there. But one must know how to look at such paintings. The people who first
visited the Impressionist exhibition obviously poked their noses into the
pictures and saw nothing but a confusion of casual brushstrokes. That is why
they thought these painters must be mad.
(E.H.
Gombrich, The Story of Art, Phaidon, London 1995, reprinted 1999)